Amber Machowski – Plaintiff Filing ADA Lawsuits
Amber Machowski, a California ADA Plaintiff, has filed thousands of lawsuits against businesses in California. She is now represented by ADA Plaintiff attorney Frederick Chernoff, Anoush Hakimi, Peter Shahriari, Reha Singh of The Law Office of Hakimi & Shahriari, who file ADA lawsuits. In lawsuits we have seen, ADA Plaintiff Amber Machowski claims to have neurological issues and muscle atrophy have resulted in weakness, reduced motor function, and limited mobility in the left lower half of her body. Ms. Machowski is permanently confined to a wheelchair.
Some of the most recent lawsuits filed are:
Amber Machowski V. Rishi Sachar, Date Filed: 07/12/2024, Case number: 30-2024-01412496-CU-CR-WJC
Amber Machowski V. Lucila Sandoval, Date Filed:07/11/2024, Case number: 30-2024-01412441-CU-CR-WJC
Recent News
ADA Plaintiff Amber Machowski recently filed a lawsuit in Superior Court of the State of California County of Los Angeles on 06/21/2024.
Case Name: Amber Machowski V. R & N Properties I, LLC, ET AL.
Case Number: 24NNCV02420
Sample Lawsuit Below
ADA Plaintiff Amber Machowski, represented by Frederick Chernoff, Reha Singh, Anoush Hakimi of The Law office of Hakimi & Shahriari alleges the store is a public place that needs to follow rules to make sure it’s accessible for everyone, including people with disabilities. The store was either newly built or changed after 1992 but didn’t follow the laws about making the building accessible. The ADA Plaintiff Amber Machowski who visited the store two times in 2023 found several problems, like parking, signs, and pathways, that made it difficult for them to get around. She claims the store doesn’t provide the same access to people with disabilities as they did for other customers.
The Property and/or the Business owned, leased, and/or
operated by Defendants is a facility that is open to the public and includes a business
establishment.
- The Property has been newly constructed, and/or underwent
remodeling, repairs, and/or alterations since 1992, and Defendants have failed to
comply with California access standards that applied at the time of each new
construction and/or alteration or failed to maintain accessible features in operable
working condition.
- Plaintiff visited the Property during the relevant statutory period on
two (2) separate occasions, on July 21, 2023 and November 18, 2023, to patronize
the Business on the Property.
- The premises violated applicable California and federal construction related accessibility standards, including Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations (California Building Standards Code), Part 36 of Title 28 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (28 CFR Part 36), the ADA Standards for Accessible
Design (“ADAS”), and the ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and
Facilities (“ADAAG”).
- Defendants did not offer persons with disabilities equivalent facilities,
privileges, and advantages offered by Defendants to other patrons.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers, both physical and intangible, that
interfered with, and denied, Plaintiff the ability to use and enjoy the goods, services,
privileges, and accommodations offered at the Property.
- Parking, route(s) of travel, signage, Business entrance, Business
interior, and other architectural amenities for patrons visiting the Property are
among the facilities, privileges, and advantages offered by Defendants to patrons of
the Property.
- However, there were inadequate accessibility features for disabled
persons at the Property. Defendants’ facilities did not comply with the ADAS,
ADAAG, and/or the California Building Code (“CBC”).
- When Plaintiff visited the Property, Plaintiff experienced multiple
access barriers, including but not limited to barriers related to parking, route(s) of
travel, and Business interior, signage. This list of barriers and violations is not
exhaustive or completely inclusive. There are other barriers that Plaintiff
encountered at Defendants’ Property and Business.
Plaintiff encountered the following barriers at Defendants’ facilities: